Posted by: Sally Ingraham | May 2, 2011

Movie Mayhem: March & April

Rest assured – I will not be forcing you (or myself!) to slog through all 30 of the movies that I watched in the last few months. Other than a few pieces of run-of-the-Hollywood-mill fare, though, it’s been a rather interesting couple of movie viewing months. I’m have trouble deciding what NOT to talk about. Let’s see…picking and choosing, picking and choosing…

small mountainThe Tournees Festival returned to Reel Pizza Cinerama in March, and I watched three of the films – Around a Small Mountain (Writ. & Dir. Jacques Rivette. Stars Jane Birkin, Sergio Castellito, and Andre Marcon. France, 2009.), Coco Before Chanel (Dir. Anne Fontaine. Writ. Anne Fontaine and Camille Fontaine. Based on books by Edmonde Charles-Roux. Stars Audrey Tautou, Benoit Poelvoorde, and Alessandro Nivola. France, 2009.), and A Town Called Panic (Writ. & Dir. Stephane Aubier and Vincent Patar. Stars Stephane Aubier, Vincent Patar, and Bruce Ellison. France, 2009.)

Around a Small Mountain is a lovely, quiet movie about a traveling circus show, and an Italian business man who stumbles upon them and tags along for a few weeks. Equally mesmerized by the nostalgic act of the circus clowns and by the heartbroken Kate – a former performer who is attempting to confront demons she left behind 15 years ago – the charming and slightly mysterious Vittorio ambles through the lives of the performers, making little waves and accidentally starting fires – of the metaphorical type. The sunny countryside setting of Southern France makes the viewing light and summery, and the serious undertones are balanced by a playfulness that makes for a very nice film. I will be seeking out other films by Jacques Rivette in the future.

Coco Before Chanel was an excellent overview of the life of Gabrielle Chanel before she became the famous Coco Chanel. From her beginnings in an orphanage, through her adventures as a singer in a bar, to her encounter with Baron Balsan and introduction into French society, and on into her love affair with Arthur ‘Boy’ Capel, the film maintains a gentle, straightforward pace. It is Audrey Tautou’s performance as Coco that holds the film together. She is by turns rude, boisterous, shy, and always full of an understated grace. I thought the film was quite fun, partially due to many scenes that show Coco improvising with the materials around her and concocting her bold and utterly personal outfits. Again, the French countryside is used to pretty effect. A very decent biopic.

panicA Town Called Panic is hilariously fun. Using animated toys (a cowboy, an Indian, a horse, etc.) an epic tale unfolds. After a backfiring birthday present destroys Horse’s home, our heroes end up traveling to the center of the earth, crossing an arctic landscape, getting captured by mad scientists, and exploring an underwater world. Surreal and super bizarre by turns, with a lot of French spoken at electric speed, and characters that live in a state of constant high-energy panic, the movie is edge-of-your-seat fantastic. I could not stop laughing – snickers, giggles, all-out belly laughs. Fun, fun, fun. I want to go watch this again right now!

I have been working my way through any and all Tony Jaa movies that I can find. He is an explosive martial artist from Thailand whose more well known films include the Ong Bak trilogy, which I watched, as well as The Protector (Writ. & Dir. Prachya Pinkaew. Stars Tony Jaa. Thailand, 2005.) Jaa’s Muay Thai skills and absolutely astonishing athleticism makes for some exciting visuals, although plot-wise these movies leave one or two things to be desired. Not for the squeamish, and chock-a-block full of fight sequences, Jaa’s films also include interesting cultural details. He does all his own stunts – they’re very clear about this in the special features – which is interesting to know as some of the stuff he does is mind-boggling. Not sure I’m really recommending these so much as gushing indulgently – unless you’re a martial arts fan, in which case check ’em out. There’s an especially fun sequence in The Protector when Tony Jaa pits his Muay Thai against a fearsome Capoeira fighter. Eeeee!!

wild targetWild Target (Dir. Jonathan Lynn. Writ. Lucinda Coxon. Based on the film Cible emouvante writ. Pierre Salvadori. Stars Bill Nighy, Emily Blunt, and Rupert Grint. UK, 2010.) This film is a little odd, but with a cast like that how could you not watch it? Bill Nighy plays a professional assassin who can’t quite bring himself to off Emily Blunt, a quick thinking quicker fingered aspiring art thief. Rupert Grint plays an accidental apprentice assassin, and the nutty adventure the three of them live through is funny and sweet and a little ridiculous. This one is definitely headed for a home in my Bill Nighy collection.

Unknown (Dir. Jaume Collet-Serra. Writ. Oliver Butcher and Stephen Cornwell. Stars Liam Neeson and Diane Kruger. USA, 2011.) Here’s a thriller that is actually a bit thrilling, and a bit unpredictable. When a man awakes from a coma to discover that someone else has taken his identity and no one (not even his wife) believes him, that’s just the beginning. Being hunted down by ruthless killers is the least of Dr. Martin Harris’ worries, as he attempts to solve the puzzle and keep his taxi-driving illegal immigrant side-kick Gina alive, while also attempting to prevent the assassination of a famous philanthropist. I was kept guessing longer than normal with this one. Good stuff.

Happythankyoumoreplease (Writ. & Dir. Josh Radnor. Stars Josh Radnor, Malin Akerman, Kate Mara, Zoe Kazan, and Michael Algieri. USA, 2010.) Okay, maybe this film is a little too cute and too clever, but I liked it. A batch of young adults trying to figure out life and relationships in NYC – not unlike the story Josh Radnor continues to live through on How I Met Your Mother most weeknights on prime-time television. However, a little similarity is fine and this movie has its own crop of joys and sorrows and major life decisions and revelations of the heart. It is charming and funny and all that too. Warm fuzzies.

janeJane Eyre (Dir. Cary Fukenaga. Writ. Moira Buffini. Based on the novel by Charlotte Bronte. Stars Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender. UK, 2011.) I’m still trying to wrap my head around this recent envisioning of one of my favorite books. I can’t decide if I liked it or not. There were things that I LOVED about it – like Mia Wasikowska’s performance as Jane. BRILLIANT. There were things that I liked about Michael Fassbender’s Mr. Rochester. He was certainly distinctive – a bit scary. This is definitely a man whose mind is very unstable, with madness hovering. Which is pretty much as it should be. I liked the feel of the film, and the cinematography was often stunning. The music was lovely too. I think my biggest complaint would be that it seemed choppy. I would almost say rushed, but the pacing of the film was pretty good – there were just bits missing, which I know because I’ve read the book, obviously, but it was more than that. Perhaps the choppiness, the feeling of having arrived too suddenly at the next major plot point, can be excused because the story was told in a series of lengthy flashbacks, instead of linearly. Hmm. Maybe. on the laneAlso, the scary bits all seemed to fizzle. I remember watching the BBC mini-series with Timothy Dalton and Zelah Clarke as a kid and being absolutely petrified at every part that dealt with the mad woman in the attic. And Mrs. Poole (a nearly non-existent character in Fukenaga’s version) was also spooky. In Fukenaga’s film, the scary bits are extremely understated, which almost makes sense and I almost liked the effect. Being so used to the full-blown epic Gothic romance though, effected my impressions of this version. Which really only means I want to see this one again. There were stellar bits in it too – such as when Jane first encounters Rochester in the eerie twilight lane… Anyway, very interesting film. I’m reserving final judgement on it for the moment.

Something should be said about Twister (Writ. & Dir. Michael Almereyda. Based on the novel Oh by Mary Robison. Stars Harry Dean Stanton, Suzy Amis, Dylan McDermott, and Crispin Glover. USA, 1989.) other than “OMG, it’s the WEIRDEST!” but that’s all you get from me today. If you’re in the mood for a sweet treat, Kings of Pastry (Dir. Chris Hegedus and DA Pennebaker. Stars Jacquy Pfeiffer. Netherlands, UK, USA, France, 2009.) should do the trick – although it’s about a super stressful competition and grown men cry! I watched The Color of Magic (Writ. & Dir. Vadim Jean. Based on the novel by Terry Pratchett. Stars David Jason, Sean Astin, and Tim Curry. UK, 2008.) after L wrote about it this winter. It definitely made me want to read Thief of Time again, my favorite of the Discworld books that I have read thus far. On the animated front, I knocked off Megamind (Dir. Tom McGrath. Writ. Alan J. Schoolcraft and Brent Simons. Stars Will Ferrell, Tina Fey, and Jonah Hill. USA, 2010.) which was amusing, and Rango (Dir. Gore Verbinski. Writ. John Logan. Stars Johnny Depp. USA, 2011.) which was also amusing. And oh my gosh, I nearly forgot!!! THIS MOVIE:

illusionist
The Illusionist (Dir. Sylvain Chomet. Writ. Jacques Tati and Sylvain Chomet. France, 2010.) I have seen a few Jacques Tati movies and liked them well enough, and of course Sylvain Chomet is the genius who brought The Triplets of Belleville to life, not to mention The Old Lady and the Pigeons, so when I heard about this film (which is a mostly finished script by Tati that Chomet rescued and brought to life) I knew that I had to see it. It fulfilled my expectations – the quirky animation style was the perfect medium for Tati’s nearly wordless tale of a stage magician who is being politely shuffled to the side as rock bands become the new thing. The Illusionist of the tale IS Tati, with his tall, gently stooped form and shambling walk. He meets and is adopted by a young Scottish girl, who follows him to Edinburgh where he works odd jobs to support them while letting her believe that he is still a successful performer. The detail in every scene is incredible – I’m just blown away by the animation. The story is funny and sad, and has a satisfyingly loose end. Another excellent film from Chomet. I can’t wait to see more from him.

And that about does it. What’s a great (or spectacularly bad) movie that you saw in the last few months?

Posted by: Sally Ingraham | May 1, 2011

The Dodecahedron or A Frame for Frames

dodecahedronby Paul Glennon

I’ve intended to read this book since Isabella of Magnificent Octopus mentioned it at the end of a post about Life A User’s Manual last year. In her entry on the book itself she lists among 12 reasons why you should read The Dodecahedron that it is as much a puzzle as it is a book. Fresh off the sheer delight of reading Life A User’s Manual (which is very much a bookish puzzle) and hungry for more, I eagerly put The Dodecahedron on my TBR list.

I’m glad I didn’t get to it until now, because it was exactly what my reading life needed at the moment. Reading has felt very lack-luster lately and I feel as though I have been just going through the motions. The Dodecahedron is the first book in awhile that has bestirred me out of my mental lethargy. While it is not perhaps a great story, and is rather lacking in any concrete characters or a compelling narrative voice, the puzzle of the thing more than made up for any faults. The book is made up of short stories that seem at first to be unrelated until you start to notice certain details cropping up repeatedly. Plotlines or characters keep resurfacing in new and different molts, the current tale references several others, and the whole thing turns out to be an interlocking form – a dodecahedron of course. Emily in her exquisite awesomeness has posted a diagram of the dodecahedron that Glennon carefully crafted via story, which makes me feel gleeful every time I go and look at it again!

I have already described this book as “fun” in a recent post, and I will say it again. The stories are full of intrigue and adventure, messages in bottles, little boys who eat books, polygamists, stranded arctic explorers, etc. The mechanics of the thing are not subtle, and the tales are over the top – both things that I should have found annoying. In this case though, the act of reading was joyous for me – it was an absolute delight to explore the dodecahedron, and that has been missing from my reading experience lately.

This was my first pick for The Wolves this year and I’m pretty satisfied with it. In May we will be reading Gabriel Josipovici’s What Ever Happened to Modernism? which I’m looking forward to. I liked Moo Pak quite a bit when we read it last year so I’m interested in revisiting Josipovici. Discussion will be on the last weekend of the month if anyone cares to join us.

Posted by: Sally Ingraham | April 27, 2011

Merrily failing away

There have been a few times in the past when I have contemplated changing the name of my blog. Usually when I have been an especially enthusiastic book blogger, I consider giving my blog a makeover – setting more serious guidelines, coming up with a title that reflects my status as something a bit closer to a book review site. I always hesitate though, because I am prone to doing basically whatever I like with my blog (writing about knitting, or cooking, or photography, or travel as the mood strikes me) or not blogging at all for long stretches (like lately). It was this habit of not keeping up with my blogging that inspired the name of my blog – “What we have here is a failure to communicate“. This line from Cool Hand Luke has rarely failed, when spoken with the right accent and tone, to dissolve arguments between CP and I into laughter. I’m rather fond of my blog’s name and I am grateful that I have kept it.

Because while I no longer consider the lapses in my blogging to be a failure to communicate, I happily embrace my failure to tell anyone about Skippy Dies by Paul Murray (which broke my heart and made me laugh) or Little Black Book of Stories by A. S. Byatt (which was tolerably interesting). After all, I am not exactly a book blogger – not all the time anyway.

Today for instance, I am a photo-journalist. Grilling, crocus hunting, and cat spying as spring finally gets underway here in Maine:

DSC01169DSC01569
DSC01559DSC01562

I’ll pop back over here in a few days to write about The Dodecahedron or A Frame for Frames by Paul Glennon because it was exactly as much FUN as I had hoped and because no matter how delinquent my book blogging gets, I still love my Wolves!

Posted by: Sally Ingraham | April 18, 2011

West Virginian Wanderings

I went to West Virginia for a few days last…I was going to say week, but I’ve already been back for nearly a week…! Hard to believe – April seems to be careening to a close with unusual speed this year. Of course, traveling in April (my least favorite month, especially in my home state) is genius, because while you spend a period of time doing something exciting and interesting you can simultaneously skip that same amount of time in your usual life – by which I mean, when I got back it was several degrees warmer and the sun stayed up several minutes later and all the huge shipments of merchandise at work had magically disappeared, etc. – and April was half over. Genius!!

A good friend of mine moved back home to WV last winter, and I leaped at the chance to explore a new state with a guide who loves it. My friend is a great travel companion – we have toured Maine together, and New Brunswick, and we are queens of the day-trip. While I would have been happy to lounge on her parent’s deck in the lovely 65-75 degree weather, drinking and eating and getting in the hot tub, I knew that visiting her would entail so much more.

We ate and drank and lounged and hot tubbed, but we also spent two days driving around WV, ventured into Ohio, visited Spruce Knob (highest point in WV), managed not to get carsick on the excessively twisty-turny roads, walked in the woods, saw Seneca Rocks, sampled gin and vodka and white whiskey, toured the state capitol building, picked ramps, saw bridges both large and small… I was amazed by how beautiful WV was. Mountains, waterfalls, lush foliage (even though spring was barely springing), architecture, farmland, picturesque ruins, radio equipment… Every tiny wandering road has surprises down it, and hardly a road among them doesn’t run along beside a stream, or curl up a mountain, or race along a ridge line – most of the roads do it all!

I highly recommend exploring WV, and I have every intention of going back there whenever the opportunity presents itself. Here is just a taste of what there is to be seen:

DSC01200Ramps
DSC01323DSC01299
DSC01364DSC01505
A pretty home, ramps, ribbony mountains, a creek, a giant telescope, and the New River Gorge Bridge.

More pictures here.

Posted by: Sally Ingraham | April 1, 2011

On the 1st day of April…

*ahhchooh*

Bugger, my computer is covered in dust! Much good that plastic sheet did… The house projects continue, but the good news is that the sanding of sheet rock and ceiling mud is totally finished. Slap a bit more paint on the walls, and the living room will be all set, leaving me free to work on the corner that will eventually be my library/office. Having unburied my computer, I see that after two days away my e-mails have piled up and my Google Reader is spilling over.

Fortunately I have an unexpected day off, due to the snow storm. Here’s a funny winter/spring mash-up:
DSC01166

I planned to spend my day reading and blogging about all the movies I saw in March, but I sat down to watch ONE episode of Doctor Who over breakfast, and now…something like 5 hours later…I finished the 2nd season (of the reincarnation of the Doctor Who show, for the sticklers out there) and I AM A MESS. So good, so sad, so fantastic!

Now, I must accomplish something productive… Making lunch sounds like a good plan. Happy 1st of April!

Posted by: Sally Ingraham | March 26, 2011

Conversation in The Cathedral

convo in the cathedralI’m not giving up, I’m not surrendering, and I’m not admitting to defeat. But I’m absolutely choosing to not finish this book. I have taken pride in the fact that since The Wolves inception about a year ago, no matter how busy I have been, or how difficult the read has been, I have always finished the pick of the month. They say that pride comes before a fall, so I suppose that I have tripped and gone sprawling over this 600+ page tome. However, I feel more like I’ve finally gotten the tethers on my hot air balloon untangled and untied and I’m floating off into the sky, light and lovely and free…

I made it about 230 pages into Conversation in The Cathedral by Mario Vargas Llosa – far enough to feel like if I was going to get into the swing of things I should have managed it by then. The narrative, mostly composed of multi-character conversations, often with several entirely separate conversations twined around and through each other, is the type of stylistic writing that I expected to enjoy. This time it drove me nuts, and I grew increasingly frustrated at my inability to differentiate between various characters (many who seemed to have more than one name…) Something just did not click for me, even though I WANTED to like the book.

And I didn’t exactly dislike it. I can appreciate that Richard (whose pick it was) found the layers of conversation intoxicating, and that Emily found the story to be rich and thought-provoking. (Still waiting to hear from the other members of The Wolves.) Judging from what I read, the complex revelation of the moral and economic decline of the characters that populate Vargas Llosa’s Peru, and Peru itself, probably makes for a compelling tale, and one told in a fascinating style. It just did not work for me at this time. Who knows? Maybe I’ll return to it later in life and it will blow my socks off.

For the moment though I am happily moving on to other stories, content to leave Santiago and Ambrosio (and all the rest of them) to their warm beer and cigarette butts…

I’m looking forward to April’s read – Paul Glennon’s The Dodecahedron, or Frames for a Frame. Since I’m the one who picked it I’m crossing all my fingers in hopes that everyone will like it, including me! Discussion will begin on the last weekend of the month.

Posted by: Sally Ingraham | March 22, 2011

This and That: a Tuesday in March Update

I have gone back to work and have spent the last few weeks cleaning and dusting the store, unpacking merchandise, setting up displays, getting used to being on my feet for 7-8 hours again, and getting up early. I am newly miffed each season by how much time and energy work sucks up – on top of the actual time spent working, however enjoyable that may be (and I am fortunate in that I pretty much enjoy what I’m doing these days), in addition I have to get ready for work, commute to work, commute home, and wind down from work. Which leaves…not that much time for the rest of the things I like to do. But this is not news to the majority of you since we are all essentially in the same boat. So I won’t fuss about it any more.

Outside of work, I have been slowly pecking away at Conversation in the Cathedral by Mario Vargas Llosa, The Wolves pick for this month. It’s a hefty, beastly thing at over 600 pages and I have been struggling with the layers of conversations and timelines. I have let myself dare to believe that I am starting to get it all sorted out and the reading will be easier from here (around p. 220) but we shall see…

once upon a time vI am drawn to the artwork that Carl V. has picked for his Once Upon A Time V challenge so much that I almost want to participate simply in order to display the banner on my blog! Anne-Julie Aubry’s work is SO lovely. And Carl V. is an excellent host, as I found during R.I.P. V last fall. His challenges leave plenty of wiggle room, and you can dive right in or just play in the shallows with equal appreciation from him and the readers who join him. I want to read some more Byatt and Crowley and maybe even some Tolkien this spring, nothing specifically picked out, so I’ll just commit to The Journey, agreeing to read at least one book from the four categories: fantasy, folklore, fairy tales, or mythology. And it’s a given that I’ll also participate in the Quest on Screen part. I’ve had some enticing fantastical stuff on my Netflix list for quite awhile. The challenge runs from March 21st to June 20th. I’m eager to find some new books, movies, and bloggers through this Once Upon A Time V adventure.

I have a pile of movies to write about, but I’m going to get to them next week (and meanwhile add more to said tower of Pisa…) I’ve been watching a lot of Doctor Who and Torchwood episodes this month, but I’ll spare you the details of this growing obsession…

lunchIn other news, while going on a cheese and antiques hunt with my boss from the store yesterday, we came across the most darling restaurant in Camden, ME. The Old World Potato Company has only been open for a few months, but the concept is genius and I hope they are in business for a long time. They serve soups, salads, and baked potatos – all prepared simply, but delectably. The cupboard-sized establishment is painted a rich chocolate brown inside, with white glass bowls and pitchers accenting on high shelves. It was adorable and functional and we had a very satisfying lunch. This lunch in fact:

After spending my day off shoveling 4 fresh inches of snow off the driveway, and running the cats to the vet and the car to the shop and my butt to the grocery store, I intend to finish today by making a beef pie and drinking some red wine. Cheers!

Posted by: Sally Ingraham | March 13, 2011

Odds & Ends: de Lint, Woolf, and Byatt

A bit of my reading in the last few weeks has fallen through the cracks. I’m doing a little housekeeping today, and along with the dust bunnies dragged from beneath the fridge and Dorito fragments coaxed out of the carpet, I found a couple of books that deserve a mention here.

moonheartBack in February, in the midst of the sudden resurrection of my interest in faeries, I followed a tip from Caroline and went traipsing about in the world of Charles de Lint, via Moonheart. Here we find the usual epic struggle between good and evil, with sorcerers attempting to fight off ancient wraths and the Canadian Mounties attempting to keep a lid on increasingly odd deaths and destructions… While the nearly sentient Tamson House is the most compelling character, there are a few other interesting details too. I enjoyed the mix of Celtic bardic magic and Native American(ish) shaman powers. The novel is full of problems though – the complex story suffers from bad pacing, with intense periods of action separated by chunks of exposition and descriptions of settings that don’t have enough going for them stylistically to make up for the disruption in the flow of the story. The large cast of characters were tolerably well drafted, but I didn’t find myself rooting for anyone and by the end of the book even characters I liked were starting to get annoying. This is only de Lint’s second book, and to all reports he got better from here so this may not be the end of my venture into his world. But my interest in faeries has been effectively quenched for the time being.

flush
Not long ago I found an odd sentence leaving my mouth – “I just read a really cute book by Virginia Woolf!” Flush: A Biography can certainly be described this way, but “cute” does fall rather short and probably would have irritated Woolf immensely. Flush is the tale of Elizabeth Barrett Browning’s dog, a cocker spaniel who was mentioned frequently in her letters and whom Barrett spoke of as though he were a person. It covers his entire life – from puppie-hood in the country to the long quiet years as Barrett’s sick-room companion, his initial animosity toward Robert Browning, his capture by dog snatchers and eventual recovery, and the happy free years in Italy before his sudden death. Woolf avoids the talking animal ploy, revealing Flush’s thoughts and feelings from an omniscient point of view (although, dare I say, not quite as well as Rosalind Belben did in Our Horses in Egypt). Overall the book is amusing and sweet, but in the excellent preface to my Persephone Books edition, Sally Beauman points out that there is much more going on. Noting the parallels between Elizabeth Barrett’s imprisonment by her father, Woolf’s own carefully monitored existence under the watchful eye of her husband, and of course the transformation of the wild and free animal into the sedate and adored lapdog, Beauman states: ‘It is this tension, between protection and confinement, between dependence and freedom that underpins Flush.’ Flush is quite a fascinating book, and certainly much more than just a cute story about a dog.

elementalsI just finished a collection of short stories by A. S. Byatt called Elementals: Stories of Fire and Ice. It was fantastic. Her writing is quite lovely, and I really enjoyed the mix of reality with elements of folk and fairy tales. Each tale dealt with some sort of tension between two intense emotions or situations, and Byatt deftly and lyrically built worlds and characters that I quickly identified with. My favorites from this collection are Crocodile Tears, and Cold. Having finally tried Byatt, I’ll definitely be seeking out more from her.

And now, back to cleaning the house… Or perhaps I’ll call it good and settle down with Conversation in the Cathedral for a few hours, before CP and I go to watch the Bangor Symphony Orchestra perform this afternoon. I am eager to hear Beethoven’s Symphony No. 2 in person, and I am REALLY excited about hearing Variaciones Concertantes by Alberto Ginastera. It’s an Argentinean piece with Argentinean rhythms and melodies, but in an orchestral setting. I have never heard it before, but from the description it sounds amazing. We will also be going to dinner at a new place in Bangor – The Fiddlehead Restaurant. Should be a fun afternoon/evening. Hope everyone else is enjoying their Sunday!

Posted by: Sally Ingraham | March 5, 2011

Our Horses in Egypt

our horsesby Rosalind Belben

Smiling sweetly, Griselda Romney’s mother, Mrs Lupus, climbed into the back of the motor.
Mrs Lupus said to her chauffeur, Maurice, “Shake the children off at five miles an hour.” As they dropped from the running board, plop, plop, she watched. She gave a benign wave. Mrs Lupus reported to her elder daughter, Ida, at Quarr, that Griselda had gone mad and was proposing to take Nanny to Egypt.

Children plopping off the running board of the motor under the bemused glance of Mrs Lupus – thus begins Our Horses in Egypt. I don’t feel like I was particularly distracted when I started reading the book, but I didn’t register this micro scene until I came back and read the first chapter over again. Going back to read over again happened fairly frequently as my foray into the book continued. Belben’s style, particularly her dialog, is peculiar. I enjoyed it immensely from the get-go, but I still had the occasional trouble following it – “Wait…what?” moments. Having gone back to read over, I often found myself chuckling – it’s a rather funny book.

Why is Griselda Romney proposing to take Nanny to Egypt? Because little Amabel must have Nanny, and Griselda must have Amabel. Griselda cannot be expected to return to England in any hurry, because ‘ “She is going…” in a bursting tone “…to trace her horses.” ‘. Philomena the horse was requisitioned in 1914 and pressed into war service in Egypt and Palestine before being sold off locally. Griselda simply must rescue her. Griselda’s search for Philomena is coupled with an account of Philomena’s experiences during World War I, and the thing in its entirety makes for some amazingly compelling reading.

The dialog comes in fits and starts, and it was easy for me to hear The King’s English spoken through the nose (put Maggie Smith in Griselda’s shoes), which seemed only proper. In an interview Belben said her style wasn’t as unusual as people made out – ‘I’ve been listening to that sort of inconsequential, batty chatter for half my life. My last two aunts continued to talk like that together until quite recently – until they died.‘ So half the book is batty chatter, and the other half is from Philomena’s POV, but not in her own words thank goodness. Belben tags along on all Philomena’s adventures, and you get a sense of what the horse feels and experiences, but it is never too intrusive. It’s actually quite remarkable how real Philomena seems, and the degree to which Belben made her a full-blown character without reverting to the talking animal ploy.

The details are rather brutal. The military and war scenes are intense, full of both the ghastly and the strangely beautiful. The landscapes of Egypt and Palestine are vivid. In the bits with Griselda in Cairo and elsewhere, Belben quickly and deftly jots down minor characters and street scenes that explode from the page. There is lots and lots of terminology that goes a bit over the head if you’re not familiar with mounted calvary tactics and other military maneuvers, or if you’ve never ridden a horse in your life – but instead of being irked by this I was mildly fascinated.

Actually, on the whole I’m rather excited about this book. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Aside from the goodies that I’ve mentioned already, it delved into some serious stuff too. Griselda’s feeling of moral duty toward her horse is questioned by the people around her, who wonder how she can mention her dead soldier husband and her lost horse in the same sentence. She comes off as more devoted to the animals around her than the humans at times, especially in Cairo when she is brought to tears by the suffering of the working horses but barely sees the poverty of the people who are attempting to care for them. Still, I am impressed by her devotion and determination, and the fact that she stepped so far out of herself to do something for someone else. Can you really question the fact that it was an animal and not a person?

I am very much looking forward to reading more from Belben, and I heartily thank Emily for picking this book for The Wolves‘ February read (we’re all posting a week late, due to other reading commitments!) March’s pick: Mario Vargas Llosa’s Conversation in the Cathedral, which we will discuss starting Friday, March 25th.

Posted by: Sally Ingraham | March 2, 2011

Movie Mayhem: February

February began in the proper fashion, movie-wise. I watched Groundhog Day (Dir. Harold Ramis. Writ. Danny Ruben and Harold Ramis. Stars Bill Murray, and Andie MacDowell. USA, 1993) on Groundhog Day, and was once again tickled by Bill Murray’s antics and revelations. Then I spent some time catching up on new releases and watching the breakfast and coffee-length Wallace and Gromit movies. After SF36 it took me a few days to have any interest in watching movies, but I finished out the month with a few good ones.

The New (to DVD) Releases:

RedDir. Robert Schwentke. Writ. Jon Hoeber and Erich Hoeber. Stars Bruce Willis, Mary-Louise Parker, John Malkovich, Morgan Freeman, Helen Mirren, and Karl Urban. USA, 2010.
I think I’ve mentioned many times that I’m a sucker for an all-star cast. This movie has half a dozen of my favorite big Hollywood names, but fortunately it also has an amusing and energetic plot. It’s always fun when retired black-ops agents get their butts back into gear and fight off the baddies! Especially when they do it with the “yippy ki-aye” of Willis and the melt-you-in-your-shoes style of Mirren. There were some stellar camera sequences in this too – all in all, a fun, slick flick.

murdockThe A-TeamDir. Joe Carnahan. Writ. Joe Carnahan, Brian Bloom, and Skip Woods. Stars Liam Neeson, Bradley Cooper, Sharlto Copley, and Quinton ‘Rampage’ Jackson. USA, 2010.
Another pretty cast, and a rip-roaring and ridiculous plot. A group of Iraq war vets with a superior skill set seek to clear their name after being framed for a crime. Sharlto Copley is particularly fun as nutty Captain H. M. Murdock (although I had a few unavoidable flashbacks to District 9).

Knight and DayDir. James Mangold. Writ. Patrick O’Neill. Stars Tom Cruise, Cameron Diaz. USA, 2010.
I love to hate Tom Cruise, but he’s often decent in secret agent roles – especially ones where he’s a bit batty. He’s plenty batty in this as a secret agent on the run from his own agency, who believe he’s gone rogue. Pretty mechanic June gets tangled up in his schemes and they both struggle (comically) to stay alive and save the day. I love to hate Cameron Diaz too, but she is also quite good in this and the pair of them make for some rollicking entertainment.

UnstoppableDir. Tony Scott. Writ. Mark Bomback. Stars Denzel Washington, Chris Pine, and Rosario Dawson. USA, 2010.
How do you stop a runaway train that is carrying toxic gases and is barreling at 80 mph toward Stanton, PA and it’s elevated curve? That’s the question of the day in this film, which is roughly based on a true story. The solution is obviously to have an aging railroad veteran and a young rookie go to the rescue. In Tony Scott’s hands this story is Very. Intense. of course, but also pretty interesting, and heck – it’s about trains, which are cool and not as overused as other blockbuster plot ploys. Decent stuff.

The Wallace and Gromit‘s:

wallace and gromitHow can you go wrong with one of history’s most endearing and hilarious a-man-and-his-dog pairs? Wallace and Gromit in A Matter of Loaf and Death (Dir. Nick Park. Writ. Nick Park and Bob Baker. Stars Peter Sallis and Sally Lindsay. UK, 2008), Wallace and Gromit in A Close Shave (Dir. Nick Park. Writ. Nick Park and Bob Baker. Stars Peter Sallis and Anne Reid. UK, 1995), and A Grand Day Out With Wallace and Gromit (Writ. & Dir. Nick Park. Stars Peter Sallis. UK, 1989) are all pretty equally fantastic. It’s fun to see the progression of the characters’ looks, as the animation style developed, but the charm is there from the beginning. I think I still have one more of these 30 min. gems to watch, and then I’ll probably have to revisit The Curse of the Were-Rabbit. Hopefully Nick Park is working on something new, but meanwhile, having watched all of the TV show Shaun the Sheep I will be seeking out Creature Comforts. I hear the show is hilarious, and I definitely still need my breakfast and coffee and cartoon fix!

The Good Ones:

Feed the FishWrit. & Dir. Michael Matzdorff. Stars Tony Shalhoub, Barry Corbin, Ross Partridge, and Katie Aselton. USA, 2009.
A burned out children’s book writer accompanies a friend to a tiny Wisconsin town to be his moral support when he joins the locals in their Christmas Polar Bear Plunge. These well laid plans go bizarrely wrong, and he soon finds himself battling the elements, the sheriff, and the deer hunters on his own. A few new friendships develop, and a romantic interest emerges from the brisk Wisconsin winter. It’s quite a nice little movie.

dragon hunters
Dragon HuntersDir. Guillaume Ivernel and Arthur Qwak. Writ. Arthur Qwak and Frederic Lenoir. Stars (English version) Forest Whitaker, Ron Paulson, and Mary Matilyn Mouser. France, 2008.
Once again I was rewarded for following a suggestion from L and watching this movie. Do read her excellent review, since my mumblings here will not do it justice. It’s a refreshing take on the old story of knights and dragons, set in a fantastical world where the land floats about in chunks through the sky. The animation style is lovely, and it is funny and touching. The visuals are really what set it apart, but it is unusual in other ways too, and definitely has a non-US made feel. I highly recommend this for the animation and fantasy lovers out there. Thanks for another great suggestion L!

What was a good movie YOU watched in February?

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories